_edited_edited.png){kind=small}
Leadership
Suren Ramlochun
Principal, Glenmore Partners
Suren Ramlochun has spent the better part of two decades operating, acquiring, and restructuring businesses — not advising from a distance.
That distinction is the foundation of this firm.
In 2015, he acquired Phoenix Fire Life Safety and built it into a multi-entity operating platform through organic growth and acquisition, serving as CEO for seven years. During that period, he acquired a controlling stake in Nutech Safety and integrated it into the Phoenix group, navigating the governance complexity, capital sequencing, and execution risk that acquisitions demand when reversibility is limited.
From 2022 to 2024, he served as Vice President at Fire+, overseeing the Life Safety Division across British Columbia and Alberta, managing integration and operational discipline across a scaled, multi-site business.
Since 2017, he has operated 1847 Ventures Inc., a holding company with portfolio interests across public safety, real estate, health and safety distribution, and fire protection, including the acquisition and integration of a fire company in BC, Canada. This has provided direct, ongoing exposure to how capital behaves inside operating businesses at different stages of structural maturity.
Yantra Capital, founded in 2025, is the institutional expression of that operating experience, working with companies across life sciences, including drug development, medical devices, and diagnostics, as well as healthcare prevention and nutrition manufacturing.
Glenmore’s structural readiness work directly serves companies in these sectors, where regulatory complexity and capital sequencing carry material consequences.
Glenmore is the operating and advisory platform that precedes that capital work.
BSc Economics, University College London | MBA, Cornell Johnson Graduate School of Management | FCSI
The Practice Behind the Determination
A readiness determination is not the opinion of one person.
It is the product of a structured assessment process built on a bench of practitioners who have operated inside the same problems Glenmore is asked to evaluate.
The practitioners central to that capability:
Timothy Obademi
Operations Transformation and Governance
Timothy brings 11 years of direct experience in operations transformation, strategy, process reengineering, and HR across domestic and international businesses. He has worked at the intersection of structural change and organizational execution — the precise terrain where governance weakness most often surfaces under capital pressure.
His work informs how Glenmore evaluates operating systems maturity and governance architecture: two of the seven pillars of the Readiness Standard.
Formerly Manager, Business Transformation at Ernst & Young.
MBA | PMP | ISO 22301 | ISO 56002 | CEP
Darren Li
Strategic Positioning and Market Legitimacy
​
Darren brings 10 years of strategic marketing and brand strategy consulting, with a proven track record in aligning high-level strategy with operational execution across diverse industries.
His work informs how Glenmore evaluates market legitimacy — whether a company’s commercial position is supported by evidence rather than narrative alone.
Formerly Senior Engagement Manager, Kotler Marketing Group.
BBA
Tariq Ashraf
Data, Systems, and Operating Discipline
Tariq brings 12 years of expertise in ERP, SAP, BI and analytics, with deep implementation experience across FMCG, Pharmaceuticals, and Manufacturing.
His work informs how Glenmore assesses operating systems maturity: whether reporting discipline, data architecture, and internal controls are capable of sustaining institutional scale.
MSc | SAP BW/HANA | SAP BI | MS Power BI
Why This Matters
Readiness determinations are only as credible as the people conducting them.
A governance assessment without someone who has restructured operations is incomplete. A capital sequencing view without someone who understands systems maturity is guesswork. A market legitimacy determination without someone who has navigated institutional positioning misses the point.
Glenmore’s determinations draw on practitioners who have operated inside these disciplines — not observed them from the outside.
That is what makes a determination consequential rather than advisory.
How We Think About Leadership
Leadership is not a function.
It is a responsibility.
It shows up in three places:
Decision rights — knowing who decides, when, and why.
Accountability — owning outcomes, not narratives.
Restraint — choosing what not to do, even when options exist.
Titles do not create leadership.
Structure reveals it.
Independence and Judgment
Glenmore operates independently.
We do not represent capital providers. We do not advocate for transactions. We do not optimize for outcomes that compromise structural integrity.
Our role is to confront structural blind spots — before capital does.
When leadership is aligned, capital becomes a tool.
When it is not, capital amplifies whatever already exists.
Who We Work With
Glenmore works most effectively with leaders who:
Value clarity over consensus.
Accept that structure precedes scale.
Understand that credibility is earned through decisions, not storytelling.
Are willing to confront uncomfortable trade-offs before capital forces them to.
This is not coaching.
It is not facilitation.
It is consequential work, for moments when the decision cannot be undone.
Finally
Leadership is tested when options narrow.
Glenmore exists for those moments.
If you are approaching one, and you understand what this work requires, the next step is a readiness determination.